| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. CSM7 Dec Summit Topic - Voting system changes - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
None ofthe Above wrote: Two step wrote: There was some discussion of randomly handing out a PLEX for every 5K votes or something to a random voter. I liked that idea, not sure why it didn't happen. Perhaps it is time for the CCP art departm...
- by Inquisitor Kitchner - at 2012.12.06 13:27:00
|
2. CSM7 Dec Summit Topic - Voting system changes - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I still think tghe best solution is: All players get to vote for 1 candidate, top 14 candidates are elected to the CSM. Then there is a run off election where the players get to vote for 1 person each for who they want to be on the "main" CSM. T...
- by Inquisitor Kitchner - at 2012.11.30 10:38:00
|
3. CSM7 Dec Summit Annoucement and Topic Index - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
On the issue of NDA topics: It's not just to hide the content from competition in the market, it's also to hide it from players. Knowing what the EVE community is like if I was potentially planning something really exciting I'd rather not tell e...
- by Inquisitor Kitchner - at 2012.11.30 10:34:00
|
4. CSM7 Dec Summit Annoucement and Topic Index - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Two step wrote: Jackie Fisher wrote: No feedback topics on lunch? I'm waiting for the menus from CCP. If they try to give us fish balls again, we are going to Nonnis. Don't be so rude. If you turn down fish offered to you by an Icelan...
- by Inquisitor Kitchner - at 2012.11.28 17:06:00
|
5. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Let me just say a few things: 1) I approve of the fact the CSM is both being transparent and actually having a vision to being with. Even if I disagreed with the entire document, I'd appluad the fact it exsists and that the CSM has been forthcom...
- by Inquisitor Kitchner - at 2012.11.19 10:24:00
|
6. I Challenge Hans ... - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
No gloves slaps in thread. Left disappointed.
- by Inquisitor Kitchner - at 2012.10.24 10:31:00
|
7. Farms and Fields (0.0 Vision Discussion) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Scatim Helicon wrote: If anything, I'd like to see last year's 0.0 discussions done again for lowsec, highsec, and wormspace so we can get a unified vision of how all of Eve's space fits together. Yeah I think a big unified vision document ...
- by Inquisitor Kitchner - at 2012.10.18 16:19:00
|
8. It will be interesting to see what GSF does / who they field for CSM8. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I'd like The Mittani to run again. just because it'd be hilarious.
- by Inquisitor Kitchner - at 2012.10.14 18:13:00
|
9. Farms and Fields (0.0 Vision Discussion) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I remember when this was all fields.....
- by Inquisitor Kitchner - at 2012.10.11 09:15:00
|
10. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: So I'm going to go with: the CSM is valuable. I totally agree, I was responding to his comment of "just don't make the rest of us have to rely on ANY of them for an improved game." I trust CCP to, in general most of the ti...
- by Inquisitor Kitchner - at 2012.10.11 09:06:00
|
11. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Reticle wrote: Lord Zim wrote: And iirc half of those 10k votes were from hisec (or at least non-goons). vOv There's no way for you to tell who they were from, i.e. whether they were free 51-day Buddy accounts with a character still sittin...
- by Inquisitor Kitchner - at 2012.10.09 09:20:00
|
12. Issler, I'm Curious and Hope You'll Reply - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Scatim Helicon wrote: Well, its hard for any CSM candidate to come out and say what most miners really want, since 'less risk, less effort, less interactivity, less decision making' isn't exactly a compelling campaign slogan. Most Americans...
- by Inquisitor Kitchner - at 2012.10.08 13:03:00
|
13. CSM7 Progress Reports - from the desk of the Vice Secretary - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
As a bit of constructive criticism, putting "Ongoing pressure to..." tells me nothing. Try to be a bit more specific with it if you can even if its just "Several skype conversations about...". After all I could legitimately write that we have "p...
- by Inquisitor Kitchner - at 2012.10.08 13:01:00
|
14. Scarcity of Resources - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I like the suggestion of expanding Null Space out more and more. I've always wanted to be part of a growing space empire that grows by us literally doing nothing.
- by Inquisitor Kitchner - at 2012.10.08 11:14:00
|
15. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: Inquisitor Kitchner wrote: Realistically all it takes is The Mittani posting to the Goons telling them to vote for 14 candidates and you know that the Goons will all vote for those 14 candidates. Do you really want a system ...
- by Inquisitor Kitchner - at 2012.10.02 13:51:00
|
16. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Pipa Porto wrote: So? The people who fill out the ballots choose who they want to list. You're complaining that politicians are able to convince people of things. No, I'm saying a system like STV is promoting a real benefit of people...
- by Inquisitor Kitchner - at 2012.10.02 08:52:00
|
17. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Pipa Porto wrote: That's not STV. The candidates don't get to choose where the votes for them go when they get eliminated, the individual ballots do. Yes the candidates do because the candidates say "If you support me vote for the followin...
- by Inquisitor Kitchner - at 2012.10.01 11:29:00
|
18. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Benilopax wrote: What's wrong with non-compulsory ranking STV? I know organisations who have STV counting software that CCP could use, even ones that are compatible with online voting forms. Because STV is mega bad. Whenever you get a situ...
- by Inquisitor Kitchner - at 2012.10.01 09:43:00
|
19. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I just had an idea actually. If we look at the aims of the system, it looks like CCP see 4 points to be improved: 1) Limited say in the other 13 members of the CSM 2) "Wasted" votes 3) Easy strategic voting 4) People don't "believe" in the syst...
- by Inquisitor Kitchner - at 2012.09.29 10:57:00
|
20. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
CCP Xhagen wrote: Thanks again for continuing this. Under the Schulze method E and A are elected, under FPTP it is C and A and with the STV it is C and A (like you elegantly point out). [snip] a: 22% in the top 1, 78% in bottom four b: 18...
- by Inquisitor Kitchner - at 2012.09.26 14:46:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |